Services

Three ways to work together.

Pricing follows a scoping conversation, not a website. Pick the closest fit below - we'll refine it in five minutes on a call.

01

Service

Fixed-scope project build

A defined system, designed and delivered end to end - an execution engine, a broker integration, a trading platform, a data pipeline. Clear scope, clear architecture, production-ready at handover.

Best whenyou have a specific system to build and want one senior engineer accountable for all of it.

Discuss a project →
  • Architecture document up front
  • Reviewable increments
  • Hardening before launch
  • Deployment & docs included
02

Service

Engineering-as-a-Service (EaaS)

Continuous engineering capacity for a live system - maintenance, monitoring, new features and fast response when markets or brokers change. Your system keeps a maintainer who already knows it inside out.

Best whenyou run production fintech software and need it to stay reliable and keep evolving.

Discuss a project →
  • Reserved monthly capacity
  • Same-day response window
  • Roadmap reviews
  • On-call for incidents
03

Service

Architecture & code review

A focused audit of an existing trading or fintech system - concurrency safety, failure handling, security and scalability - with a written report of concrete, prioritised findings.

Best whensomething already runs, but you want a specialist's eyes on it before it scales or before it breaks.

Discuss a project →
  • Concurrency & race-condition audit
  • Failure-mode mapping
  • Security review
  • Written report with priorities

On pricing

I don't publish rates. For specialist fintech work, pricing should follow a scoping conversation, not precede it - a number on the page only anchors me down and invites the wrong clients. Tell me what you're building and you'll get a concrete number quickly.